I was introduced to the P21.org website earlier this year by a co-worker. We spent time in our meetings reviewing each type of 21st century literacy, sharing what it meant and what that literacy can/would look like in our world language content area.
My initial reaction to the website was that it made a lot of sense that today’s students need different skills than I even needed when I graduated from high school ten years ago. One key thing that jumped out at me was that world languages are listed as a critical 21st century skill. I attribute this to the fact that with new technology comes a greater need and ability for global communication as Thornburg discussed in his video lecture The Changing Work Environment Part One (2010). It is clear that Thornburg’s ideas and work are supported by the skills framework as he stated in his video program Skills for the 21st Century (2010). For me the graphic is very helpful to see how the skills tie together to form a bigger picture of 21st century learning.
The information that surprised me on this site is that there are not more state initiatives to encourage 21st century learning. There are only sixteen states listed that applied and are working on an action plan to increase 21st century readiness of students. This is something that I feel every state should be aware of and committed to.
On the site I really do not disagree with anything to be honest. The skills framework and means to get there seem on target to me as far as important skills for the changing world and work environment. In my opinion the 21st century skills described support the education of the whole child through a variety of life, social, learning, career and technology skills.
The implication of 21st century skills for students is that they have to be prepared for increasingly demanding, technology oriented and global jobs. This means more rigor and variety in the topics that they need to master. Reading, writing and arithmetic are no longer the only standards of general knowledge. To truly be prepared they must work hard and apply different skills to all curricular areas and it is up to contemporary teachers to equip and prepare them.
One implication of the information on the P21.org site for me as a contemporary educator is that because students need different technology skills I need to change the way I teach from traditional paper and pencil methods to more technology based assignments and assessments. Another implication is that as a contemporary teacher there is a need to teach all different types of skills in my class such as financial literacy, civic literacy, health literacy and environmental literacy which means more cross-curricular connections. In addition there are always life and thinking skills that must be taught strategically as we go through the curriculum. All of these literacies and skills help to form a more prepared student but it definitely points out how truly strategic we must be as educators to ensure that students are learning and using the skills they need to be successful once they leave our classrooms and our schools.
References
Laureate Education, Inc. (Executive Producer). (2010). [Webcast]. Skills for the 21st century. Baltimore, MD: Laureate Media.
Laureate Education, Inc. (Executive Producer). (2010). [Webcast]. The changing work environment part one. Baltimore, MD: Laureate Media.
Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (n.d.). Partnership for 21st century skills. Washington DC: Author. Retrieved from: http://www.p21.org/index.php
I, too, have been struck by the importance of knowing world languages for the 21st Century learner. I think that being able to communicate in several languages has always been important tool or advantage, but in the "flat world" we live in now, it is becoming increasingly vital. It surprises me that very few students in the States, even today, leave their formal schooling speaking more than one language (unless they are ESL students). Most other countries require it, don't they?
ReplyDeleteThat was an interesting point, needing to have the world languages in it. This is something that I felt us as a nation did not do a good job with because learning a language is much easier at a younger age.
ReplyDeleteI now look at this though through the eyes of a teacher and I have to ask, if we are suppose to teach all these different skills to the kids, when are we suppose to do this. I remember hearing somewhere that the school year is quite a bit longer in other countries. I think that is something we are going to need to take a look at as a nation, because if we are to teach everything the students will need, we need to find time to do so.
Thanks for your post!